For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a buddy - my extremely own “best-selling” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it’s likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading innovation reporter …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there’s a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone’s name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed “solely to bring humour and delight”.

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a “personalised gag gift”, and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to broaden his variety, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It’s likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

“We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact indicate human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, menwiki.men founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It’s works of art. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

“I do not believe the use of generative AI for innovative purposes need to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals’s work without approval ought to be banned,” Mr Newton Rex adds. “AI can be very powerful but let’s develop it fairly and relatively.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers’ material on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness,” says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of development.”

A federal government spokesperson said: “No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK government’s brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public information from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and prawattasao.awardspace.info especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair use” and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it’s not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and forum.pinoo.com.tr whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded totally free app on US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American’s current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a “bestseller” I’ll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts since it’s so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I’m not exactly sure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.