For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a friend - my very own “best-selling” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it’s also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet’s prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading technology journalist …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone’s name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed “entirely to bring humour and happiness”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to widen his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It’s developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It’s likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

“We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually suggest human creators’ life works,” states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It’s artworks. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

“I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people’s work without consent should be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex adds. “AI can be extremely powerful however let’s develop it fairly and relatively.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers’ content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against removing copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy,” states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing industries on the vague promise of development.”

A government spokesperson said: “No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that to increase the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair usage” and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s existing dominance of the sector.

As for oke.zone me and garagesale.es a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a “bestseller” I’ll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it’s so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m not sure the length of time I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.