For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a good friend - my very own “very popular” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few easy triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It’s an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it’s also a bit recurring, trademarketclassifieds.com and very verbose. It might have surpassed Janet’s prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start “as a leading technology journalist …” - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there’s a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I’m not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person’s name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed “exclusively to bring humour and joy”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to broaden his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It’s created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It’s likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

“We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact imply human developers’ life works,” states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It’s works of art. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And wiki.tld-wars.space although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

“I do not think using generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals’s work without permission must be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be really effective however let’s build it morally and fairly.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers’ content on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

“All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

“Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of happiness,” says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The federal government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the unclear pledge of development.”

A federal government representative said: “No move will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI plan, a national data library including public data from a broad range of sources will likewise be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector yewiki.org to deal with less policy.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair use” and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable use - it’s not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American’s current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly desire a “bestseller” I’ll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, forum.altaycoins.com and it can be quite hard to read in parts since it’s so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m unsure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.